Comments on: Should we rename OpenfMRI? Request for community input https://reproducibility.stanford.edu/should-we-rename-openfmri-request-for-community-input/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=should-we-rename-openfmri-request-for-community-input Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:48:42 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 By: Tomas Knapen https://reproducibility.stanford.edu/should-we-rename-openfmri-request-for-community-input/#comment-141 Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:48:42 +0000 http://reproducibility.stanford.edu/?p=272#comment-141 Using the word “Imaging” makes it difficult to extend the platform’s focus to include EEG, human intracranial electrophysiology, and monkey single/multi-unit electrophysiology. The broader the scope, the better imho.

]]>